The Difference Between Combative Training and Martial Arts

Getting the facts straightTraditional martial artists often rely on archaic
Recently, I was checking the sales ranking for mytraining methods and spiritual philosophies of a
book on Amazon.com, when I noticed I havemuch more primitive time. Where MMA athletes
finally received a customer review on Amazon.rely on the most up to date drilling and scientific
After reading the review, I found myself humbledtraining ideologies. Much more is known today by
and dumb founded. The customer who reviewedthe general populous on the matters of
my book on military knife and hand to handpsychology, physiology, anatomy, physics and the
combat was obviously a practicing martial artist.economy of motion. It is the lack of the most up
He appeared to be one of the "Know it all" typesto date sciences that make much of the
as well. Although much of his review on the layouttraditional fighting arts obsolete and inefficient. In
of my book may be spot on; I was amazed atessence it is the tradition itself that makes many
his blatant ignorance in not knowing the differencemartial arts training methods in effective and
between combative training and martial arts. In hisinefficient. Now that we have identified the martial
own words,"Though the author may know whatarts, we should compare it to today's modern
he is doing in this book, you may already as well.combatives.
If you took some sort of M.A. class for anyThe combative training of today is a product of
period of time that was worth anything, then youthe military machine. Today's military is more
would have learned most if not half of theseefficient and productive than any in history. The
techniques for knife fighting. " I must agree withphilosophy of doing the most with the least drives
him on this.the war machine. In World War II Colonels Eric
If you take some sort of martial arts class forAnthony Sykes and William Fairbairn began to
any period of time; that is worth anything;develop a new type of training for soldiers based
eventually you may learn half of the techniques infrom their experience in Shanghai and the
the book. Although I clearly state in the book thattrenches of World War I. Close Quarter Battle
my attempt is not to teach specific techniques,(CQB) or Hand to Hand Combat was the norm in
but use techniques as a vehicle to drive hometrench warfare and the soldiers fighting it needed
principles; and I admit that there are countlessto be able to quickly and efficiently kill and
numbers of techniques one can learn, not simplyimmobilize their adversaries. The two men realized
limited to my book. This guy "Cliff" is the examplethat they needed to develop a system for
of how many can not distinguish the differencetraining or ideology of training that would enable
between martial art and combative training.masses of troops with no prior experience in
Distinguishing the differencemartial arts to learn hand to hand combat quickly
Before one can truly distinguish between a martialin a matter of days, not the years often required
art or combative training, they must reflect uponby martial arts training. This training had to not
the origin of today's practiced martial arts. Theonly be learned quickly, but retained and trained
term "martial art", refers to a war like art; withquickly as well. Soldiers on the front and behind
martial referring to war. It is true that ages agothe lines needed to be able to react without
during the conception of today's martial arts, thethinking, relying on muscle memory. In combat the
countless numbers of systems and styles wereheart rate exceeds 180 beats per minute and all
born from military drills and close quarters battlefine motor skills go out the window.
of the time. During the ancient times without theSykes and Fairbairn realized that many of the
aid of today's modern weaponry and fire power,extravagant "pressure points" used in traditional
soldiers were forced to engage in battle withmartial arts would not be effective. They realized
clubs, swords, daggers, spears and often hand tothat pressure points were not effective for two
hand. Warriors of those times began to developreasons. One, the enemy may not feel it under
tried and true systems of both armed andthe influence of adrenaline and two; the soldier will
unarmed combat, much like today. Theymore than likely not have the ability of fine motor
understood that military units must gain muscleskills needed in order to strike the target.
memory in their tactics of choice and saw theTherefore the modern combative training was
need for regimented systems of combat. Thesimple easy to retain and concentrated on gross
methods and techniques of their day requiredmotor skill movement. Because in combat soldiers
ways to dismount riders off horse back andare all too often sleep deprived and under
break or penetrate wooden armor. It is quitenourished the techniques taught needed to not
obvious that in today's combat environment thoserely on physical strength or athletic prowess.
techniques would be obsolete. Through outToday's combatives are often known for the
generations and over the centuries the ancientdirty fighting aspect, not found in traditional martial
arts have been passed from master to studentarts. The warrior codes from long ago no longer
and master to student. The once effective andapply today, chivalry is dead. Because the
powerful combative training of the ancients hascombative techniques are taught to such a
become an antiquity.variety of fighting men who's bodies are not
Today the ancient techniques of Samurai and theconditioned to desensitizing training; the trainees
fighting monks of China can be seen beingare taught to strike with only the most
practiced through training hall windows all over thestructurally stable weapons of the body. A soldier
world. The ancient forms and techniques thatcan not afford broken hands and feet on the
were once practical battle tactics have beenbattle field. It is for many of these reasons that
manipulated by popular media and businesscombative training stands far apart from
ideology. Many practice the ancient martial arts fortraditional martial arts.
a plethora of reasons. Some of their reasons areIn summary
for the very same reasons that the training wasThe traditional martial arts, practiced today was
developed. People practice for fitness, protectionactually the combative training for the military of
and hobby. Others train simply to preserve theit's time. Just as time changes, so did the training.
art.Societies became more educated; moral values
After World War II, the west was introduced toand codes have been altered. The world is not as
the Asian martial art craze. Soldiers, Sailors andspiritually guided or involved with mysticism as it
Airmen were exposed to the Asian fighting artswas during the time traditional martial arts were
of the Japanese and Philippines and wanted toconceived. The once effective combative
learn. Many of the indigenous instructors or gurustechniques of their time, have evolved into an art
realized the opportunity to make a buck from theform surrounded in mystique and the legends of
naive westerners and began teaching wateredold; enhanced by modern media. Today's
down versions of the fighting arts. Often masterscombative training is based completely on modern
would draw out the training and add flashy,science and need for efficiency. It is of the
intricate and complicated techniques to theutmost importance for combative training to
curriculum. It was the flash that would sell to theadhere to these rules.
new western market. Soon even Hollywood- Simple general Principles must be taught
would make movies with actors such as Bruce- Must not rely on power or athleticism
Lee and Chuck Norris demonstrating their- The focus is on destroying whatever the
athleticism and prowess on screen.principal comes into contact with
Belt ranking systems were added to help new- Efficiency and economy of motion
students feel as if they were progressing and not- Be able to be learned and applied in a very
quit. The once effective techniques for ancientlimited amount of time (Days or weeks)
combat were reduced to nothing more thanIn conclusion
acrobatics with some self protection value. ManyCombatives training today most definitely contains
of the hidden techniques which were the pride ofmany of the techniques that one will learn in the
warriors of old were lost through the simpletraditional martial arts if they attend classes for
process of supply and demand. Modernany period of time. One might think of the two
technology and weapons only aided in losing thetypes of training as steak. One is chuck full of fat
practical fighting techniques and turning the martialthat is unnecessary and could clog your arteries,
arts into a lucrative but provocative industry.the other is a lean hybrid, that contains only the
Today there are martial art companies that placenecessary nutrients to keep you going. After
their clients on programs known as "black beltreading the review from this guy "Cliff" I
plans."immediately went to his profile to learn more
People are forced into contracts that they canabout his point of view, so I could see where hes
not afford to breach for a certain amount of timecoming from. I wanted to know if his bashing of
until they receive their black belts. During the earlymy book came from arrogance or ignorance.
20th century the "black belt" rank was respectedWhere he was asked to type a blurb about his
by many for holding fighting prowess. Today thatinterests, contained one phrase.This was his
rank has lost much of that respect. All too ofteninterest"Wing Chun and the variety of ways it is
we hear about the black belt who got beat up byspelled." I immediately realized by this and the
a boxer or street fighter. All too often a whitenumber of books with titles like "Kung Fu of
belt student can completely annihilate their "blackCaine" Referring to the Caine from the TV series
belt" Karate or Kung Fu master during sparring in(Kung Fu), that this fellow was not completely
the training hall. Today the sport of Mixed Martialfamiliar with the differences between martial arts
Arts has proven that the martial arts of old areand combative training. Therefore I wanted to
obsolete to even today's modern trainingwrite this article, with my best effort to
methods. The MMA athletes of today , that holddemonstrate that when comparing martial arts
no belt in any martial art would dominate overtraining to combative training; it is like comparing
more than half of the practitioners of traditionalapples to oranges.
martial arts.