Myth of the Sword

The Myth of the Invincible Sword Nearly allimpact when parrying and can be prone to
cultures throughout history have been subject tobreaking. Many styles of the sword offered little
the myth of the all-powerful sword. China's historyhand protection and so the hand of a swordsman
is filled with legendary swords and swordsmenwas a primary target. To counter this, some
some of whom even rose to the levels of gods.swords were built with elaborate basket-like
The Japanese have the legendary Samurai withguards to protect the hand. There are accounts
their world famous katana, often referred to asof the basket-hilt broadsword of Scottish
the Samurai sword. Cossack, Moor, and otherhighlander fame having to be pried off of the
Muslim cultures are often remembered asHighlander's hand after battle due to its collapsing
mounted, saber-wielding warriors. In Westernunder the pressure of enemy blows. The sword is
Europe the medieval knights were in no way ancomplicated to learn, time consuming to make,
exception to the sword culture. The sword'sand generally an expensive arm. In medieval
symbolic connection to the heraldic nobility remainsEurope, a single-handed broadsword could cost as
to this day, although in ceremonial form only. Formuch as 25,000 dollars by today's standards. The
most cultures around the world, the sword stillJapanese katana was, in its own fashion, an
holds a position of reverence. I have dueled andequally high-priced weapon. One can see the
sparred with and against swords for many yearsobvious reasons why, during Eastern and Western
and yet I am still amazed when the first wordssword histories, the weapon was really more of a
out of almost every new student are, 'I want toclass and power symbol than a mainstream
learn how to fight with a sword.' I explain thatweapon for war. There is a Japanese house code
unless your armored and riding a horse wheneverthat states "Do not yearn for katanas and tantos
the sword is pitted against nearly any othercreated by famous masters. A katana or tanto
ancient weapon of equal length or longerworth 10,000 pieces can be defeated by 100 yari
inevitability it comes up wanting. However, the(spears) each costing a 100 pieces. It is better to
invincible sword myth is so deeply ingrained inpurchase 100 spears and arm 100 spearmen, in
human culture that such warnings are rarelythis way you can defended yourself in time of
heeded, and predictably, the sword becomeswar." (Toshikage Jushichikajo, 1480) Today the
most students' first focus. The sword's truesword and Samurai have nearly become the
combat nature can only be revealed through thesame word. Yet during the height of the age of
handling of the real thing, authentic replicas, andthe Samurai, the bow, naginata, and spear were
precise training weapons that are meticulouslythe main focus for war. The bow is found in the
designed for proper accuracy and use. With theearliest history of Samurai warfare and the
aide of such training tools the myth of the swordYari-Samurai, elite spearmen, mounted or on foot,
can be unlocked, not just from a historicalwere among the highest valued warriors in a
approach but from a hands-on approach as well.warlord's army. The katana was more often used
Sadly, often schools do not follow an accuracyas a backup weapon and for personal ritualized
policy with training weapons or when sparring withdueling. In most cultures during the age of
weapons. This is one reason why there are sobattlefield dueling, duels were fought on horseback
many misconceptions about genuine swordwith bows or lances. If the warrior lost either of
combat. The Japanese sport of kendo isthose weapons, he then used his sword as a last
commonly believed to be a martial art based onditch effort to save or take his life. Around the
dueling with katanas. Nothing could be furthersame time the drafted peasant soldier of the late
from the truth. The two are as different asnineteenth century came into full force, the
kickball and baseball. The kendo sparring swordsword, due to its impractical functions on the
called a shinai is a straight sparring sword meantbattlefield, was eventually reduced to an
to be a safe representation of the katana. Thisornamental symbol of authority. During the
very light weapon averages anywhere from 35"Second World War the ancient Samurai sword
to 47" in length and is made of several straightthat was made using the secrets of a holy
strips of bamboo bound together with leather.swordsmith still remained among the upper class,
With the exception of the lengths, the balancebut the sword for the average officer was a
and design of this sparring tool from its tip to1933 mass-produced weapon. This 1933 version
handle holds absolutely nothing in common withwas designed so that the older traditional katana
the Samurai's curved katana. The shinai blade isblade could fit into the handle and replace the
straight and its handle is long, round, and wrappedstandard contemporary blade. Because of the
in a soft leather sheath. The katana blade isentertainment industry from ancient times to the
curved and its handle is long and somewhat eggpresent, the myth of the swordsman's abilities
shaped but a little more flat along the sides, and ithas always been far beyond any true feat of real
is braided. The hits and points scored in sportswordsmanship. The western broadsword has
kendo have more in common with Europeanfollowed the same path as the eastern swords,
cudgel play or fencing than with a katana duel.only it has been even further reduced into a
Points are most often scored with snapping hitssimplistic, shining hip-hanger used only for parade.
as opposed to the drawing cuts that comeThe Chinese straight sword has not escaped this
naturally with a curved blade. Though snap cutssymbolism either. It has been reduced to a
are also a part of the katana's arsenal they arelightweight flimsy show piece far more suitable for
not a staple of attack as in kendo. A closerfast acrobatic Wu-Su routines then actual combat.
representation would be sparring with curvedWhat the general public has been led to believe
wooden bokkens, which are considerably morealmost entirely through the media is that the
accurate reproductions of the katana and weresword was the most powerful dueling weapon of
the traditional training weapon of the classicalall times. There are many reasons why the sword
Bushi. The bokken offers a close though notcould not actually hold this title. First as mentioned
completely accurate representation of a bladedis reach; second, arch versus thrust; third and
katana duel and was often used for dueling as amost important, exposure. To better explain the
replacement for real swords. Miyamoto Musashi,realities of sword combat and the troubles a
arguably one of the greatest swordsmen inswordsman would have, consider facing a
Japanese history, by his own account won severalspearman with a sword. To start the
duels against katanas with a bokken. As withswordsman's troubles, the spearman need only
shinais, the same problem arises from modernkeep the swordsman the distance of a spear
and the ancient western forms of cudgel play.thrust away. In doing so, the swordsman is put in
The rattan or other wooden forms ofdanger of spear attacks while his target, the
broadswords are bulkier, unbalanced, poorlyspearman, remains out of reach. Being out of
weighted, and often have no obvious flat side toreach of the attacks of his opponent, the
parry with. Because of these design flaws cudgelspearman has many advantages added to his
play can only be considered a sport not a form ofhopes of self-preservation. A spear, or even a
combat. One should not compare theselance of ten feet or less, can both cut and thrust
sport-related styles of combat to the real thing. Alike a sword and so deliver a variety of attacks
comparison cannot accurately be made if for nowithout fear of immediate counterattack. For the
other reason than the sparring weapons are soswordsman to survive, he needs to close the
dramatically removed in weight, shape, and designdistance on his opponent while trying to ward off
from the weapons they are supposed to replicate.thrusts and cuts from the attacking spear. The
When a student reaches a high enough sword skillspearman need only keep attacking while
to spar against other types of weapons, theretreating or circling a few steps if necessary.
design flaws of the sword as a singly competitiveThis is comparable to a man with an empty
weapon become painfully obvious. It is not longeighteenth-century musket fighting a ten-pace
after this realization that the sword student fadesduel against a man with a colt revolver. Unless an
out of the picture along with dreams of becomingact of God occurs, the musketeer is in for hard
an invincible swordsman. The few persistenttimes. The next problem is the issue of arch
sword students who remain quickly find the valueversus thrust. Everyone has seen a movie where
of an added weapon to their free hand. Shields,the hapless spearman comes charging in with a
maces, flails, daggers, or other swords becomestiff-armed thrust at the hero, who is always a
the new order of training. With a little moreswordsman, who jumps to the side and chops
sparring, the student begins to see the ultimatethe oncoming spear in two. This is a perfect
truth behind the myth of the sword. Even withexample of the mythological power of the arching
the aid of another weapon, it is a very difficultsword stroke in its full absurdity. If the
task for a swordsman to defeat longer-reachingswordsman were to attempt a wasted motion
weapons. When a swordsman is matched uplike trying to cut the assaulting spear in two, it
against a weapon that is longer and thereforewould be an ill-fated move for two reasons: it
holds greater reach capabilities that swordsman'sseriously exposes the swordsman to a
chance of survival drops dramatically. Without thecounterattack, and it is an almost impossible cut
aid of a companion weapon, even a highly skilledto make. It is one thing to cut in two a shaft
swordsman finds it difficult to defeat lesser skilledstuck firmly in the ground, it is another thing
opponents with longer- reaching weapons. Theentirely to try and cut in two a free-floating shaft
sword master Miyamoto Musashi, victor of sixtythat deflects on impact. Try hanging a spear-like
life-and-death encounters, was in a famous duel ofshaft in the air by attaching a rope to the butt of
record against the long-swordsman, Sasaki Kojiro.the shaft and attaching another rope at a halfway
Kojiro called his sword 'clothes pole' because of itspoint. Then try to chop that shaft in two with a
unique design: a long, straight, blade quite thesingle or several strokes. When you are through
contrary to its contemporary, the curved katana.shaking your head, all those great movies will be
When Musashi dueled Kojiro, he was not wielding aruined forever. The easily imagined results of this
curved katana of his own or even using hissimple test are exactly like the real results of
famous two-sword style. Instead he wisely usedsuch a cut. The reader can see just how unlikely
a large, carved boat oar to defeat his opponent.performing that cut actually is. Some Arthurian
This boat oar gave Musashi two very importantlegends claimed the sword, Excalibur, could cut a
advantages: first he did not have to concernboulder in two as though the rock was made of
himself with the angles of his cuts, and second, hebutter. Strangely, no sword culture can deny
did not have to worry about parrying with hishaving myths of an equal nature to that of
sword and having it destroyed by a big boat oar.Excalibur's. There is also a Japanese legend of a
It is no mystery why Musashi won this duel.katana so sharp that when it was left stuck in a
When two duelers meet and are equal or evenstream, floating leaves were not sliced in-two by
close to equal in skills, the odds go to the duelerit but actually purposely avoided the sword's edge.
with the technological advantage. I know theLegends of this nature have always led the
entertainment industry would have us believepopulous into believing that in the realm of edged
otherwise, but when it comes to sparring orweapons, the sword holds full royalties on slicing
dueling with weapons, you can't change the mathand chopping abilities. This is simply not true
behind the design of the weapon, techniques, andregarding personal combat. All of the elite
the movement the weapon's nature requires.warrior-based cultures knew and used the
George Silver, an accomplished dueler andadvantages of thrusting and slicing with a spear as
prizefighter who wrote two treatises on combatwell as other long-reaching weapons. The
in 1599, Brief Instructions and Paradoxes ofdifficulties of getting past that deadly reaching
Defense pointed out in his works, and Ispear would be no small task for a swordsman. In
paraphrase, "He who moves in the least amountaddition to this reach advantage, even a
of space and time, moves ahead of his opponentmoderately skilled spear fighter can deliver several
and so stays out of harm while being able tothrusts or cuts to an oncoming swordsman
inflect harm." To make Silver's point consider thebefore that sword can reach its target. History
story of David and Goliath. Goliath is unrivaled onhas shown us that one of those many spear cuts
the battlefield and no Israelite can stand againstwould be to either to the swordsman's lead knee,
him in single combat. He holds several advantageshand, arm, or foot. A good hit to any of these
over his opponents: he is stronger and so canareas would end the swordsman's attack
attack and defend with more power than hispromptly. A common misjudgment is that a large
opponent; he is taller which gives him the ability toportion of a weapon's edge needs to strike the
both outreach and outstride his opponents; and hesurface to do any real damage. An edge need
is undefeated, which gives him a psychologicalonly penetrate the depth of three fingers in the
advantage over his opponents. Goliath would likelyright areas of the human anatomy to be a fatal
have been armored and have the contemporaryhit or lead to one. Though the stroke to the knee
weapons of the times, bronze or leather armor, ais not a fatal blow, worldwide archaeological finds
bronze or wicker shield, spear, and according tofrom battle sites involving ancient weapons have
legend a great sword. On the other side of theconsistently shown that such a wound led to a
dueling scale is the boy, David. David is a merefinal lethal blow. In these archaeological digs, large
sheep-herding child, not even a warrior in thepercentages of the fallen were first struck at the
traditional sense. David's only weapon is a sling. Itbend of the knee, or other exposed appendages,
would appear that the scales tip heavily in favorand then delivered a fatal blow while they lay
of Goliath, but a more detailed look reveals theprostrate from the first injury. By studying the
opposite. The sling is a formidable weapon in thisresults of many years of full-contact dueling with
realm of single combat, especially single combattraining and blunted weapons, I have rarely found
on an open battlefield that offers room tothis cut to a charging opponent's knee, ankle or
maneuver. Bearing in mind the nature of thefoot to fail. An equally successful tactic is thrusting
ground in the Middle East, David also had plenty ofinto the opponent's oncoming feet. When infantry
rocks to choose from while maneuvering. Out ofused swords and shields against lance-carrying
necessity as a sheepherder, he would have beencavalry, the results nearly always ended in
a well-practiced slinger and skilled at keepingdisaster for the foot soldier. When foot soldiers
predators away from the herd with endless daysreplaced swords with spears and lances, the
to spend flinging rocks with his sling to pass thedisaster fell on the heavy cavalry. It was so
time away. With those skills he could haveeffective that infantry pike units became the
continually launched a rock at Goliath for everystandard for hundreds of years. Pike units were
other step Goliath did or did not take, all the whilenot removed from the battlefield until the advent
staying out of reach of Goliath's weapons; thusof efficient firearms sporting bayonets, which was
fulfilling Silvers' recipe for victory. Due to itsnot the demise of the pole weapon but rather a
translation through time, the story has led us tomerger of pike and gun. When the sword is pitted
believe that David's sling was both laughable andagainst a spear, the swordsman also has to
ultimately a shock to Goliath. Neither would beovercome the issue of too much exposure.
true, the sling has been around for a long timeCombat manuscripts of old break the sword
and was a commonplace weapon in early biblicaldown into sections depending on the type of
warfare. It is reasonable to believe that Goliathsword. The first third of the blade from its tip
was defeated because of the nature of thedown was for cutting, the next third was for soft
weapon's reach, the terrain conditions, and theparries, and the final third above the hand guard
psychological effects of the whole scheme ofwas for heavy parries and coming to grips with
things, i.e., the undefeated war giant versus ayour opponent. The old masters from the East
sheep-herding boy with everybody watching. Howand West also wrote that the preferred method
much time would Goliath spend hiding behind hisof defense with a sword was simply to avoid
shield from a boy while the Philistine and Israeliyour opponent's attacks physically and through
armies watched? Let us assume that Goliath, likefootwork. This method was preferred over
every other solider during biblical warfare, hasjeopardizing your sword's cutting edge and its
seen a sling in action before, as opposed to thestructural integrity by using it to fend off blows
common belief that he thought it laughable and fellfrom other weapons. With exceptions, the sword
victim to his overconfidence. Goliath could hidelength averages from 20 to 42 inches. On the
behind his shield and try to close within swordcontrary, the smallest battlefield spear is around
range, but in order to hit David he has to be ablesix feet in length with a shaft designed for
to see him. When Goliath exposes his face towarding off blows from other weapons. The
look, David only needs to time his next rock forswordsman must also overcome the limited range
impact into that exposed moment. It is nearlyof his defense, referring not only to the sword's
impossible to successfully time a parry against areach but also the axis with which one can parry
missile weapon launched at close range. Theand so defend the body. Take into account the
smaller the projectile, David's rock, the moremechanics of the human body and the length,
difficult it is to see, calculate its speed, andmanner, and design of the weapon being used.
accurately react to defending the target area ofThe nature of the sword creates a problem when
its destination. Also added to David's advantagesdefending above or below the waist. The problem
is he can launch his rocks continually. With the slingis to defend one's body above or below one
David can follow a familiar formula: he can attackmust, by the nature of the sword, expose the
repeatedly while remaining out of reach of hisopposite of what is defended. This is true with all
opponent's assaults. At best Goliath would haveweapons but to a higher degree with sword and
had the opportunity for one spear throw atsimilar weapons. The pole arm offers considerably
David, but again at the cost of over exposingmore options. By tipping the weapon vertically,
himself to David's faster sling attacks. After thathorizontally, or diagonally out from the body, one
spear throw its back to sword range. Whatevercan readily defend and strike from any axis of
tactic Goliath used we all know the result of it.the body. The pole arm fighter does not even
Musashi used a similar technique to David's againsthave to resort to this guard until the swordsman
the chain and sickle fighter Shishido Baiken. Again,gets in close enough to be a threat. The
rather than use his sword and face the extraswordsman, on trying to close, has to defend too
challenges that comes with it, Musashi opts tomuch exposed area and so is subject to attack
make a close range throw of his tanto, aat several areas on his body. To a large degree
Japanese dagger which hits and kills histhis is why the shield was developed. In most
unsuspecting opponent. In the West, one seldomcultures, the shield was developed for war and
hears of duels pitting a sword against anothernot dueling. The shield was designed to be part of
type of weapon. In Europe it was considered ana wall of shields used as a defensive battle tactic
unfair advantage to mix weapons during duels.as demonstrated by the front lines of a Greek
The European duel was as often a matter ofphalanx, the Roman turtle formation, and the
righting wrongs and maintaining honor as it wasViking shield wall. In a duel or single combat, the
about issues of martial skills. In the East reasonsshield is used in a considerably different manner
for dueling ranged from matters of honor tothan in a melee or mass melee. Regardless of
testing martial skills. One dueled with whateverhow it is used, the shield can only effectively
weapon one specialized in, and it was believed ifprotect one side of the body during a charge and
you were a warrior you should be able to defendso forces the wielder to defend his opposite side
yourself with your weapon regardless of whatwith the sword. Because of the leverage that can
your opponent was using, the only true rule wasbe placed behind a thrusting or sweeping pole
to win. This is a much harder test of skills than toattack, the sword and its wielding arm cannot
be protected by the equality of weapons.compete with the impact of an oncoming pole
Knowing this, one must question why dueling withweapon As mentioned earlier, this is especially
the katana did not reach its peak until after thetrue when a sweeping spear cut or a thrust is
age of elite Samurai warriors. After thedelivered to the swordsman's stressed knee,
dismantling of the Samurai class, an action thatankle, or foot. Such an attack forces the
turned the once proud warrior class into livingswordsman to bring the tip of his sword down;
archives of an age gone for good. During this laterthe arm position would be the equivalent of
era, most Japanese field weapons becamecompletely emptying a drinking mug gripped in
obsolete and where impractical to carry in public.your hand. Doing this simple motion the reader
With a major decline in the use of most battlefieldcan see how the position is both awkward and
weapons, the time for the sword to shine was atweak; furthermore, the position also exposes the
hand. The katana became the Samurai's lastupper torso. The lower guard that could be used
symbolic hold on an ancient warrior system soonexposes even more of the swordsman's body. A
to be completely outdated by cheaper and morehigh or low, well-timed thrust or cut to this weak
efficient guns. The replacement of the eliteside will put an end to the charging swordsman.
warrior class by the gun was not a phenomenonThough I have used the spear here as the
known only to the Japanese. The gun in its ownswordsman's nemesis, one can see that any
time systematically brought about the dismantlingweapon of greater length or weight would prove
of the elite warrior classes worldwide. Thetechnologically superior. It becomes obvious why
Chinese Boxers, the Scots Highlanders, the Zulu,the swordsman's survival is so unlikely. The sword
the Aborigines, and the American Indians werehas come to stand on a solid throne where its
among the last holdouts of the warrior elite, andpowers are more mythical than the
they all fell victim to the gun. For most of thesesword-wielding heroes themselves. We have
warrior cultures the sword became a symboliccome to believe the sword and its powers as the
relic of an age far more romantic then it actuallystaple of all the classical warrior societies. Swords
was. Since the end of the elite warrior classes thehave been given names and positions of power;
facts regarding the sword and its value as asome were even believed to be magical. The right
weapon have been exaggerated far and awayperson with the right sword could smite injustice,
beyond its real functions as an instrument of war.slay the wicked, and restore kingdoms, assuming
The sword has several weaknesses as a combatthat is no one else shows up with a spear,
weapon. Due to its limited reach or in the case ofhalberd, pole-flail, rake, pitchfork, or sling. The
the great sword, excessive length; one has lessentertainment industry may keep the sword on a
time for reaction to an opponent's attack. Thethrone of power and awe, but for those who
sword's edge is fragile and easily damaged sohave fought with and against the sword in all its
parries need to be made with the flat of themanifestations, it's a translucent and mythological
blade, making defense both complicated andthrone. By Larry L Andrews Find much more at
cumbersome. The tang of the sword, the blade'sspearduel.
extension into the handle, receives most of the